
LOW HUI PENG
0 3 1 3 6 0 2
Diploma in Business
Breach of Contract and Remedies
Related Article and Video

Introduction to Breach of Contract and Remedies
Discharge by breach can be defined as contracts may be terminated as a result of failure of the promisor to fulfill his obligation under the contract. A contract must be performed in accordance with its terms. The promisor must perform or tender performance of his promise. Where he has failed to do so, the promisee may be entitled to be discharged from future obligations under the contract. Breaches may occur during performance of the contract, at the time when performance is due, or even before the time for performance.
Section 40 of the Contracts Act 1950 states that when a party to a contract has refused to perform, or disabled himself from performing, his promise in its entirety, the promisee may put an end to the contract, unless he has signified by words or conduct his acquiescence in its continuance. (Lawteacher.net, 2015) Additionally, Section 76 of the Contracts Act 1950 states that a party rightfully rescinding contract is entitled to compensation. It states that a person who rightfully rescinds a contract is entitled to compensation for any damage which he has sustained through the non-fulfillment of the contract.
In the event of a breach of a contract the innocent party may claim any one or more of the remedies, such as damages, specific performance, or injunction. Damages refer to the monetary compensation or pecuniary compensation that an aggrieved plaintiff may claim from the defendant who breached the contract. The purpose of damages is to compensate the innocent party for loss suffered as a result of a breach of contract. This remedy is available as of right. Specific performance is an order of the court requiring the party who is in breach of the contract to perform his part of the contract exactly as he had promised. This is said to be an equitable remedy as it was first recognized by the courts of equity. Injunction is an order of the court directing the defendant to refrain from doing something in breach of the contract. (Drukker.co.uk, 2015)
Case Study
Two minor children of a passenger on the still missing Malaysian Airlines Flight MH 370 have sued the company and the Malaysian government for damages. They filed the suit at the High Court registry, also named the Department of Civil Aviation, the Department of Immigration and the Royal Malaysian Air Force. The two children are seeking damages for the loss of support and mental anguish, claiming that the airline had breached an agreement to ensure a safe passage for their parent to Beijing.

Malaysian lawyer Arunan Selvaraj, center, who filed a lawsuit against Malaysian Airlines on behalf of two boys whose father was on the still missing Malaysian Airlines Flight MH 370.
Reflections and Opinions
From my analysis based on the article, it is a very difficult situation. The blame cannot be allocated to any party as the aircraft has still not been found and until now there is no real information about the cause for incident to be occurred. Therefore, the both children should not sue the Malaysian Airlines and the government, because whatever happened now couldn’t proof that this issue was their fault. Undoubtedly, they will not be successful in suing the company and Malaysian government for damages. Besides, there is also no proof that the passengers on the still missing aircraft are dead. At the moment, they are just missing persons. Malaysian government and the company are both spending a large amount of money in order to find out the truth of missing aircraft incident. Thus, the children should actually endure and let them to find out the truth before they decide to sue the Malaysian Airlines or government. Even they have already sued the both parties today, however the judgement is only can be done after the aircraft has been found.
Conclusion
Breach of contract was found from the article as the airline failed to deliver the passengers to the destination. A breach was occurred during the performance of contract. The promisor, also known as Malaysian Airlines could not prevent something to be happened in sudden. When there is an incident happened to them during the performance of contract, and contract to do an act which subsequently become impossible to perform, the contract therefore becomes void.
References
-
Lawteacher.net, (2015). Malaysian contract law | Law Teacher. [online] Available at: http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/contract-law/malaysian-contract-law-essay.php [Accessed 10 Jun. 2015].
-
Jec.unm.edu, (2015). Remedies for Breach of Contract — Judicial Education Center. [online] Available at: http://jec.unm.edu/education/online-training/contract-law-tutorial/remedies-for-breach-of-contract [Accessed 10 Jun. 2015].
-
Drukker.co.uk, (2015). Injunctions defined by English law firm. [online] Available at: http://www.drukker.co.uk/publications/reference/injunctions/#.VXgqp_mqqko [Accessed 10 Jun. 2015].
-
E-lawresources.co.uk, (2015). Remedies in contract law. [online] Available at: http://e-lawresources.co.uk/Contract-remedies.php [Accessed 10 Jun. 2015].
-
Mail Online, (2014). First lawsuit is filed over the MH370 disaster. [online] Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2815448/Two-boys-father-passenger-MH370-people-sue-Malaysia-Airlines-missing-jet-tragedy.html#comments-2815448 [Accessed 10 Jun. 2015].